Autism File December 2016/January 2017

Leave a comment

Vaxxed: The powerful new documentary the CDC wishes would just go away

Del Headshot 3.18.16

Emmy award-winning medical journalist, Del Bigtree.

Del Bigtree is an Emmy award winning medical journalist with experience in producing medically-themed television talk shows on a wide variety of topics. Not one to back away from controversial issues, Mr. Bigtree became interested in the possibility of a potential link between vaccines and autism after receiving numerous viewer requests over the years for media involvement in covering the topic.  The release of audio recordings in August, 2014 of conversations between autism parent and researcher Dr. Brian Hooker and senior CDC scientist Dr. William Thompson which highlighted autism research fraud at the CDC left parents of vaccine-injured children hopeful that at last the vaccine/autism link would be widely publicized. However, the mainstream media blackout on this link has continued despite the black and white nature of Dr. Thompson’s revelations.

When Mr. Bigtree became aware of the content of the Hooker/Thompson conversations, he made some life-changing decisions, ultimately collaborating with Dr. Andrew Wakefield in producing the documentary Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe. Vaxxed has been accepted into the 2016 Tribeca Film Festival and is scheduled to be shown on Sunday, April 24 with its New York premiere set for the first week in June.  Autism File executive editor Rita Shreffler spoke with Mr. Bigtree recently on the challenges in bringing the truth about vaccine injury and CDC autism research fraud into the mainstream consciousness.

Rita Shreffler: Can you tell our readers a little about your background and how you became involved in the vaccine/autism controversy?

Del Bigtree:  I spent the seven years prior to working on this film as a producer on The Doctors, a nationally syndicated daytime medical talk show. The shows were energizing, covering life-changing events. I’d find myself scrubbing in with physicians in the OR, then coming back to Paramount Studios to edit the pieces. I enjoyed the whole process especially because the topics often focused on advancements in medicine and surgery that were incorporating, what used to be thought of as alternative approaches, such as lasers and acupuncture.

Early on, we were covering a controversial story about rickets because a number of families had their children taken away from them for what looked like child abuse.  I wanted to include a radiologist on the show who could confirm that rickets in infants could cause the kind of fractures that were being mistaken for abuse.  The man I talked to said, “Del, you don’t want me on your show.” He went on to explain that he was considered a “quack” because of his belief that vaccines were linked to autism. We did end up having him on the show and all went well.  His comment about vaccines and autism stuck with me as the show was consistently getting requests from parents asking that we investigate the autism/vaccine link, but it was clear that until something changed in the overall discussion, we wouldn’t be taking it on.

RS:  It’s always been nearly impossible to get any kind of mainstream news coverage when it comes to a potential link between vaccines and autism despite the fact that thousands and thousands of parents have the same story of typically developing children who regress following vaccines. Why do you think that is?

DB: There are several factors that are probably at work. For some reason that’s hard for me to fathom, vaccines are considered the Holy Grail by many in mainstream medicine and in a lot of the general public as well. Even among my friends who understand the dangers of GMOs and speak out against Monsanto, most seemed shocked that I would question the safety of vaccines.

I challenge people to, the next time they watch TV, try and count how many times they do not see a pharmaceutical ad during a commercial break. I remember the days when you’d only see prescription drug ads while in waiting rooms in doctors’ offices.  That box in all of our homes has become one big pharmaceutical ad, and the profit motive keeps getting bigger. With the Gardasil push alone, now targeting 9-26 year-old girls and boys with three shots each, $30 billion dollars could end up in the hands of Merck and a lot of politicians. That kind of money has to be watched. Another factor may have to do with the revolving door between the CDC and the pharmaceutical industry. It says a lot that Julie Gerberding, former head of the CDC, is now the president of Merck’s vaccine division.

One other thing I find disturbing is the number of doctors I’m hearing from who tell me that they know that vaccines are linked to autism but that coming forward with the truth will destroy their careers.  They literally say, “I don’t want to get Wakefielded.”

RS: I’m also struck by the fact that anyone who even questions vaccine safety is immediately labeled as “anti-vaccine” which tends to paint people as fringe lunatics. All the parents I know who have vaccine-injured children were at one time very pro-vaccine.

DB: I think there’s a loss of humanity and common sense here. If it’s determined that the bars of baby cribs are too far apart, there’s a recall. If Toyota produces cars that may have an issue with brake pedals, there’s a recall.  If there’s a piece of plastic found in a Snickers bar, there’s a recall. But when tens of thousands of parents come forward wondering if vaccines may have played a part in their kids’ regressions into autism, we’re told that they are “misinformed”.

RS:  How was it that you came to collaborate with Dr. Wakefield?

DB:  In August of 2014, I received a call from the same doctor we’d had on the show for the rickets topic who told me in two weeks a whistleblower from the CDC is going to “come out” and say that the CDC had committed fraud on the MMR autism study.  They knew the vaccine was linked to autism and they covered it up.  Two weeks later, Brian Hooker’s taped phone conversations with senior CDC scientist William Thompson hit.  On The Doctors, we’d typically viewed people with the CDC as our friends as they often provided us with story ideas, letting us know what topics were becoming newsworthy so this was shocking to me.

A month or two later, California’s SB277 became an issue as it would end all religious and personal belief vaccine exemptions. I’d always been taught by my parents to question authority, and I couldn’t even imagine that the government would be given the authority to decide what would be injected into my child’s body. Legislation like this marks the end of freedom as we know it. In the blink of an eye, the freedoms our founding fathers tried to ensure can be taken away from us.

In the midst of the SB277 situation in California, I received a call from a friend asking if I knew who Andy Wakefield was and whether I’d like to meet him. I was bothered that almost 10 years after The Lancet retracted Dr. Wakefield’s MMR paper, the whole topic was still coming up again and again.  At a certain point, the fact that people just can’t let the issue drop makes the whole thing become a red flag.

So I ended up attending a private function in Hollywood Hills and met Andy Wakefield for the first time. He told me that he was working on a documentary about the CDC whistleblower and as we talked, because of my work in TV and medical issues and my growing interest in the vaccine/autism topic, the whole thing began coming together.

I flew to Austin shortly afterwards and saw the film Andy had been working on.  I realized I was looking at the biggest story of my lifetime. I’d spent the last eight years of my life producing medically-themed shows and felt that I’d been trained for this moment.

RS:  Did you have to give up your work on The Doctors to get involved in Dr. Wakefield’s documentary?

DB:  At that time, the show went into hiatus so I could lock into the project to research and call doctors to discuss it. More than one told me that I was making a career-ending move by aligning myself with Andy Wakefield.

RS:  Weren’t you concerned about that possibility? That you might be forever giving up such a great career that you obviously enjoyed?

DB:  If I decided to look the other way and not tell this story, and my kids or grandkids got sick, I’m not sure how I could live with myself.

When I watch Billy Tommey, I see the potential of so many. These kids weren’t injured by falling off the roof. They were injured because parents trusted their doctors. These kids lost the future they and their parents had every right to expect. And the rates of autism continue to skyrocket. This year, roughly 100,000 kids born will develop autism. Each year, we’re filling up a city the size of Athens, Georgia with kids diagnosed with autism. We can’t ignore what could lead to the demise of our society.

I’d always kept the parent stories I received while working on The Doctors in my mind.  Now we have a senior level CDC scientist telling us, “We lied,” about the safety of the MMR. The moment I looked at Dr. Thompson’s data, I knew I had to tell this story. If you see a wave of events like this and do nothing, that’s criminal.

I couldn’t not give up my job. If this is the last film I ever make, I’ll be okay.

RS:  What were your main objectives in producing Vaxxed?

DB:  I want the media to be held accountable for the weeks and weeks of covering a measles outbreak at Disneyland, terrifying people when only 644 people were affected.  That’s .000002% of the people in this country which effectively translates to zero, when one in 45 kids is now diagnosed with autism. I’d like the media to explain why it won’t cover the story of a top CDC scientist who admits they committed fraud on the MMR study when they discovered a causal link between the vaccine and autism, a disease that is accelerating so fast it could spell the end of our society.  If that’s not a story what is?

I also hope the film will be a tipping point that will allow tons of doctors to come forward and admit they’ve long known there’s a link between vaccines and autism. It should create questions among mainstream audiences about the whole nature of safety testing in medicine. Drugs have to undergo rigorous studies which are far more expensive than the limited safety work done with vaccines. I want parents to realize that their kids’ vaccines are not being appropriately studied—they haven’t been studied nearly as well as Viagra. We’ve been playing Russian roulette with the health of the children in this country.

RS:  Do you have any concerns about reactions or repercussions once the film is released?

DB:  My friends and colleagues who had gotten in my face about questioning vaccine safety have had the same reaction. Every single one of them has said, “Oh, my God. I had no idea.”

The reaction among parents is especially important. I’ve seen other documentaries that never really made it past the people who already know a lot of this information and they’re already upset. I don’t want to upset them further with a film that doesn’t do more than preach to the choir.

I think there will be a huge push from several directions that will say to people, “Don’t go into that theatre.”  But I think there are a lot of people that are sick and tired of being controlled by corporate interests.  They see it in their politics.  They see it in their GMO food.  They see it in their polluted water source.  They are over it.  These people will want to know why Andy Wakefield is still here working on the same issue.  They’ll want to know, as I did, why he didn’t just walk off into the sunset. They’re going to see that this is a man who’s been fighting for our kids, despite being vilified in the press and being called a “baby killer” all because he was actually listening to parents who were telling the same story: there was no autism before their children received vaccines. The fact that he was beginning to look into the concerns of parents ended his career.

Audiences will, I hope, be hit with the realization that one of the greatest scientific minds of our time was bold enough to stand up to collective science and suffered for it, much like others throughout history.  Remember that Galileo was imprisoned for putting forth the notion that the earth revolved around the sun, which of course was later confirmed. I have to wonder if we’re ever going to stop this pattern of trying to silence the best minds that we have.

One of the most important things I’ve learned through this process, and that I think the film reflects, is that the parents involved are true heroes.  They go through unimaginable difficulties as they care for children whose lives have essentially been taken away from them, even as the lies about vaccine safety continue. But the truth will ultimately come out.  It’s just a matter of time.


Before the credits roll at the end of Vaxxed, viewers are asked for help in ensuring that our federally elected officials do the right thing by our nation’s children.

For the sake of our children, contact your political leaders and demand the following:

  1. That Congress subpoena Dr. William Thompson and investigate the CDC fraud.
  2. That Congress repeal the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and hold manufacturers liable for injury caused by their vaccines.
  3. That the single measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines be made available immediately.
  4. That all vaccines be classified as pharmaceutical drugs and be tested accordingly.

For more information, go to


Posted in Featured, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Welcome to The Autism File

Polly Tommey is an autism mother and founder of The Autism File magazine. As Editor-in-Chief, she’s been a tireless advocate for families impacted by Autism Spectrum Disorder. Polly’s work in bringing quality information to the autism community has given ASD families around the world the help and hope they need to survive and triumph. Here, Polly discusses the magazine’s role in aiding families with a newly diagnosed child on the spectrum, and also considerations as older ASD children enter school and ultimately the workforce.

Posted in Featured, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Autism File October/November 2016

Leave a comment

Autism File August/September 2016

Autism File August/September 2016

Leave a comment

Autism File June/July 2016

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Vaccine Whistleblower

Vaccine Whistleblower book cover single pate

A CDC insider’s account of research fraud within the agency highlights deceit and corruption in making vaccine/autism links disappear…

Interview by Polly Tommey, Editor-in-Chief

As anyone who has been following the developments regarding links between autism and vaccines can confirm, there’s an ongoing near-blackout in the media when it comes to issues of vaccine safety and our government’s handling of autism research. In his new book, Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC (Skyhorse Publishing), Kevin Barry presents the transcripts of recorded conversations between autism parent and researcher Dr. Brian Hooker and CDC senior scientist Dr. William W. Thompson regarding the inner workings of CDC autism research. With a preface by Dr. Boyd E. Haley and a foreword by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Vaccine Whistleblower leaves no room for doubt that the American public has been deceived about the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Autism File Editor-in-Chief Polly Tommey recently had the opportunity to visit with author Kevin Barry to discuss the book as well as the ramifications of Dr. Thompson’s revelations to Dr. Hooker.
Polly Tommey: Can you tell our readers a little about yourself and explain how you got involved in writing Vaccine Whistleblower?
Kevin Barry: I’m an autism parent. My middle son Griffin regressed into an autism diagnosis at age two in the year 2000, and I’ve been an advocate ever since. I was the first president of Generation Rescue and am currently co-president of the Elizabeth Birt Center for Autism Law and Advocacy (EBCALA). I’m a United Nations representative for an environmental health non-governmental organization and a former federal lawyer.
I became involved in a project which led to writing Vaccine Whistleblower after I was sent the transcripts of the phone calls (and the audio recordings) by Dr. Brian Hooker in the hope that I could help bring public attention to this story through media contacts. I have relationships with a few reporters who have covered the topic for years. Reporters have hardly scratched the surface of this story. Writing the book is a means towards getting Thompson’s revelations about the culture of corruption at the CDC the attention the story deserves.

PT: I’ve read this book and have to say, having a vaccine-injured son myself and knowing thousands of other families in the same situation, this was a very emotional read for me. Getting confirmation of the CDC corruption I’ve long suspected was powerful. What has been the response so far from parents who have read your book?
KB: It was emotional for me to read the transcripts the first time I went through them. I don’t cry easily, but it got to me. To learn that the CDC was even more corrupt than we previously thought was astonishing, because I already thought they were very corrupt. Dr. Hooker and J.B. Handley worked on a project for Generation Rescue which resulted in a website named in 2006. I strongly recommend that parents access this website where they can read further about the corruption discussed in Vaccine Whistleblower. While my schedule hasn’t left me room to attend conferences for in-person feedback, the comments I’ve been receiving on social media and via email is a mixture of sadness and anger, as you would expect.

PT: Can you tell our readers the basics of how the CDC committed fraud in its research as described by Dr. Thompson?
KB: As Dr. Thompson tells Dr. Hooker, the CDC knows that no one holds them accountable on vaccine safety research. That’s how the agency gets away with rampant corruption. There is no leadership from the White House, and Congressional oversight is a joke.
To continue reading, click here.

Leave a comment

The Horrors of Halloween Candy

The toxins in most traditional treats make them a no-no, especially for kids
on the spectrum…

By Dr. Lisa Sulsenti

Halloween background with silhouettes of children trick or treating in Halloween costume

Halloween background with silhouettes of children trick or treating in Halloween costume



Trick or Treat?

I am here to answer this seasonal never-ending question.

Wait for it…

We are being tricked with our treats!

That’s right. Many adored conventional candies are made with toxic harmful
ingredients.  I use to love conventional candy just as much as the next
person. In fact, I love chocolate. Call me a chocoholic if you must, but
when I began to research what really was in many of my beloved chocolate
treats, I was disgusted.

And, having three sons (one on the autism spectrum), I had to make sure we
avoided conventional sweets since many  harmful ingredients are linked to
health problems such as tumors, attention deficits, hyperactivity, behavior
and neurological problems. Crazy, I know.

Don’t worry. After I show you what is in many conventional candies and why
you must avoid them, I will provide you with delicious non-toxic
replacements. Let’s look at the good, the bad and the ugly, starting off
with the ugly!

GMO Ingredients
A genetically modified organism is an organism whose genetic material has
been altered using genetic engineering techniques. Many crops today are
genetically modified and used in our foods and drinks. When I am teaching
patients how to read labels, I have them identify ingredients that may be
derived from possible GMO sources such as glucose, dextrose, maltose,
fructose, highly processed high fructose corn syrup, corn starches and other
sugar variants (as well as, corn, soy and wheat).

According to Professor Gilles-Eric Seralini’s study on genetically-modified
(GM) corn treated with Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide, Monsanto’s NK603 GM
maize variety and Roundup herbicide, led to kidney and liver damage. GMOs
have also been linked to serious health problems such as tumors in rats. The
NON GMO PROJECT <>  list is a great tool to
know which products are safe to purchase as GMO- free. Lifesaving,

To continue reading, click here.

Posted in Diet & Nutrition | Leave a comment

The Autism and Allergy Overlap

ASD and food allergy rates have risen dramatically—and they often go hand in hand…

The food allergy and autism communities generally seen as separate groups have more in common than they may realize.  One has only to look at the meteoric rise of both epidemics in the last 20 years to wonder if they are connected.  In fact, I contend that they are the same story with the same causes and overlapping symptoms but with different outcomes. It is as though one overwhelmed child turned left while the other turned right.

Children with life threatening food allergies often have a “mixed bag” of health concerns that can include ADHD, environmental sensitivities and gut inflammation.  Typically, parents of these children pay such close attention to the food anaphylaxis that these “lesser” issues are often dismissed or medicated away.  And yet, if we view this mixed bag as a collection of meaningful symptoms, a very different picture emerges.  This picture mirrors that of many children on the spectrum.

In “The Function of Allergy: an immunological defense against toxins” (1991), Margie Profet confirms that any mammal overwhelmed and unable to detoxify will defend itself with allergy. This evolved defense is designed to expel the toxin(s) as fast as possible by sneezing, vomiting, itching or to prevent it from circulating by a drop in blood pressure.

Toxic exposures—any combination from air, food, water, drugs, pathogens, or vaccines—that precipitate the allergies can also result in a host of other health issues.  The so-called “neuro-typical” (NT) kids with severe food allergies are not NT at all if we ask additional questions about fine or gross motor skills, unusual “gifts”, attention deficit, rage, sensory processing issues, hyperactivity and more.

By illuminating the ground shared by the food allergy kids and children on the spectrum, a broader collective awareness may emerge.  This awareness will bring greater pressure to bear on addressing causes and forcing change.

The “A” words

Like the word “autism”, allergy and anaphylaxis were coined early in the 20th century. These last two were created to describe reactions to sera administered for the first time in history using the hypodermic syringe.  When children began to fall violently ill following the use of this new technology, doctors scrambled to understand why.  Pediatrician Clemens von Pirquet in 1906 saw the symptoms as an “altered reactivity” or allergyAnaphylaxis “against protection” was coined by Charles Richet around 1913 to describe the condition he created in animals during immunization experiments.

Autism was coined by a Swiss psychiatrist in 1912 and Asperger’s after the work of Hans Asperger in the 1930s. Leo Kanner in the 1940s provided a foundation for understanding the environmental causes of autism.

Food allergies and autism in children increased slowly until about 1990 at which time their prevalence abruptly accelerated.

The first wave of affected children

It seemed to happen almost overnight about 20 years ago.  Something changed suddenly at the same time in many Western countries to make scores of children terribly unwell:

  • Food anaphylaxis:  severe food allergy increased abruptly in children, but just in certain Western countries including Australia (ACT), the US, Canada, and the UK.  School teachers provided eye witness accounts of the sudden surge of severely allergic children who arrived for kindergarten in the early 90s.  The timing is confirmed by hospital ER records.  UK cohort studies indicated that peanut allergy in preschoolers had doubled in just four years through the early 1990s, from about 1% to over 3%.
  • Autism:  in the early 1990s, increasing reports of autism alerted the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  One startling report of a “cluster” of autism in Brick Township, New Jersey drew the attention of the CDC in 1997.[i]  Children born in the late 1980s and early 90s were most affected. A steep increase in autism was noted at this time also in the UK, Canada, and Australia.

Continued rise

This was the beginning of what are now epidemics of life threatening food allergies and autism.  In the US, one in 13 children (8%) have food allergies with one in 40 (2.5%, 1.8 million) being life threatening. Childhood peanut/tree nut allergies tripled between 1997 and 2008 from .6% to 2.1%.[i] There has been a 265% rise in food allergy hospitalization among children (CDC).

Autism has spiked 1,500% in the last 20 years. One in 88 children is on the spectrum: 825,000 in the US; 89,000 in Canada; 131,000 in the UK.

Food/substance triggers

Many severely food allergic children have atopy—allergies causing eczema, asthma and behavior issues.  Food allergies are the main causes of ADHD according to a 2001 study in the Lancet.[iii] The opiate effect of dairy and wheat proteins on some children is well documented. Unrecognized allergies to chemicals, molds and more can also cause behavioral changes.

It is not known how many children on the spectrum have severe allergy, but most avoid certain foods that make other symptoms worse. The worst of these according to Kenneth Bock, MD in Healing the New Childhood Epidemics (2007) are dairy, chocolate, yeast-growing foods, gluten and casein.  Allergies and Autism (2010) by Michael Dochniak tells the story of a boy with multiple allergies who regressed after an anaphylactic reaction to latex.  The role of allergy in autism can be profound and individual.


Allergy and anaphylaxis function to defend the body against acute toxicity.  The body may risk death to defend itself against perceived certain death.

Children on the spectrum can exhibit defensiveness.  Cari Neal in “Tactile Defensiveness and Patterns of Social Behavior in Autism” (1997)[iv] explains that social withdrawal functions to limit tactile stimulation. Temple Grandin, quoted by Neal, confirms that for her, withdrawal is a defense from a “tidal wave of stimulation.”

Gender and age of onset

In 1944, Hans Asperger believed that girls were unaffected by the syndrome he described although he later revised his conclusion.  The gender gap is as high as 10:1 for Asperger’s, and 4:1 for autism.  In 1964, Bernard Rimland observed that boys tended to be more vulnerable to “organic damage” than girls.

Studies on peanut allergic children reveal that twice as many boys have the condition than do girls.

Many parents see the 18 month mark or before the age of two as a point of change or regression for children on the autism spectrum.

The general age of onset for life threatening peanut allergy (the first reaction) has been declining: from 24 months of age for kids born between 1995 and 1997; 21 months for those born before 2000; and for those after 2000, it is now about 14 months of age.

GI tract damage – gut-brain axis

Since Charles Richet’s 1913 Nobel Prize winning research, allergists have defaulted to the idea that food allergy is caused by digestive failure, or a “leaky” gut.  Or it was, until the explosion of food anaphylaxis in children starting around 1990. It seemed impossible that gut failure could occur on such a scale and so suddenly.

The gut is integral to the immune system and the brain.  Also called the “second brain” because it is connected by millions of neurons to the central nervous system, the gut will react immediately when challenged by toxin or trauma:

In cases of extreme stress … the higher brain seems to protect the gut by sending signals to immunological mast cells in the plexus. The mast cells secrete histamine, prostaglandin and other agents that help produce inflammation. This is protective. By inflaming the gut, the brain is priming the [it] for surveillance.[v]

The bystander effect occurs when compounds in the body/gut at the time or moment of the extreme stress become targets for allergic sensitization.

And it goes without explanation that children on the spectrum struggle greatly with gut inflammation.  What could have the power to provoke this so early in the lives of hundreds of thousands of children?


Many following allergy and autism debates believe that both epidemics are man-made.  And the medical community appears ready at last to consider this within the “hygiene hypothesis”:

The leading theory is about hygiene – with less infection thanks to city living, smaller families, vaccines, sanitation, antibiotics, etc., the immune system is less ‘busy’ with germs and may become more prone to attack harmless food proteins.

~ Dr. Scott Sicherer, pediatrics professor at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York (Sept. 12, 2012)[vi]

The hygiene hypothesis suggests that vaccination, antibiotics and bug-killing products have unhinged the immune systems of children. Humans have co-evolved with microbes and gut parasites/worms, and without them are vulnerable to inflammatory disorders.  Our bug-free, vaccine obsessed, pesticide loving Western existence appears to have doomed us to allergy and autism.

Yes, the hygiene hypothesis has entered the discussion on causes of autism. A 2007 Medical Hypotheses article by K. Becker suggests that immune pathways affected by western hygienic practices may impact brain structure or function contributing to autism. Becker mentions “immunization” in this light but in confessing its “controversial” nature does not pursue it.

Clarifying the matter is historical fact.  The abrupt rise of allergy and autism around 1990 coincided with reforms to the pediatric vaccination schedules of many Western countries.

In 1986, the US National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in essence de-regulated vaccination:  no one could sue a vaccine maker without government approval.  Largely relieved then of liability, manufacturers moved to meet government demand addressing new “diseases of priority” established by the US Institute of Medicine.

Increases to the vaccine schedule in many Western countries began in 1987 with the Haemophilus influenza type B (Hib) vaccine.  By 1991, doctors did not hesitate to give this new conjugate vaccine to two-month-old children simultaneously with vaccines for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and polio.  This move was unprecedented.  In that year, more than 17 million doses of Hib vaccine were sold in the US alone.  In 1992, additional doses of combination vaccines were included in the schedule.  Hib was a revenue-generating “blockbuster product” according to a 1998 WHO publication.

At the same time, coverage rates for vaccination soared. Between 1993 and 1995, the Clinton administration’s Childhood Immunization Initiative provided federal funds aimed at 90% coverage of all infants. Vaccination became a requirement before entry into many preschools and daycare centers.  By 1997-98, childhood vaccination rates reached record highs.  Canada, the UK, and AU followed the American example.

In 1983, US children received 22 doses of vaccines (combined or single) for seven diseases (two months to age six). Today in the US, children receive up to 48 doses of vaccines for 14 diseases starting at birth to age six.

Unsustainable practices:  Hib

The Hib, within an intense schedule that includes five-vaccines-at-once, has been the last straw in my opinion, tipping scores of children into peanut allergy.

Where the DPT-IPV with Hib is used en masse, peanut allergy follows: first in Western countries including the UK, the US, Canada, and ACT Australia, then after 2001 following its use with high coverage rates in Tasmania, Hong Kong, Singapore and most recently India.[vii]

Hib plays a role in autism according to Brian Richmand in “Hypothesis, Conjugate vaccines may predispose children to autism spectrum disorders”. Richmand suggests that the five-in-one with Hib has interfered with nerve myelin in the brain:

This period of hypo-responsiveness to carbohydrate antigens coincides with the intense myelination process in infants and young children, and conjugate vaccines may have disrupted evolutionary forces that favored early brain development over the need to protect infants and young children from capsular bacteria. [viii]

Richmand further suggests that girls who received this vaccine carry antibodies that have the potential to damage nerve myelin and result in autism in their children.

Undeniable disaster … leads to disaster capitalism

In “Save the children (and make money)” published in The Wall Street Journal (2009), writer James Altucher noted the massive rise in the last two decades in peanut allergy, asthma and more among children.  The kids are sick and getting sicker, Altucher observed.  So, he thought an “Autoimmune Index” would be a good idea:

Such an index would consist of the best mix of stocks that have good lower multiples that will supply the arms in our ongoing war against autoimmune diseases.[ix]

Altucher lists the drugs created for these conditions, their manufacturers, the status of their stocks and their billion dollar profits.  And then without slowing he offers possible causes for the pediatric epidemics:

The increase in autoimmune illnesses and allergies in children may be due to high exposure to antibiotics and vaccines at an early age… 

Are the products causing the epidemics made by the same companies now making the remedies?  It seems investors can make money at both ends of the epidemics.

This is disaster capitalism.

Moving forward

The century old pattern of increasing drug and vaccine consumption in Western countries has meant profit for some but devastation for many more.  The autism community is aware of the conflicted interests that underpin this pattern and the autism epidemic.  And parents of anaphylactic children are listening. The stories of autism and life threatening food allergy are the same, with shared causes and overlapping symptoms.  The “mixed bag” kids with life threatening food allergy are a mirror that, as dark as it is, brings with it millions of families equally worried about the health of their children.

With a growing awareness of the ground these communities share, my hope isthat they will connect meaningfully to force change leading to prevention of these serious — and altogether avoidable — health issues.

[i] M. Blaxill and D. Olmsted, Age of Autism (NY, Thomas Dunne, 2010).

[ii] Sicherer, et al., “US prevalence of self-reported peanut, tree nut and sesame allergy: 11-year follow-up,” JACI, Vol. 125, No. 6 (June, 2010): 1322-1326.

[iii] L. Pelsser, et al., “Effects of a restricted elimination diet on the behaviour of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (INCA study): a randomized controlled trial,” The Lancet, Vol. 377, (Feb. 2011): 494-503.

[iv] Cari Neal “Tactile Defensiveness and Patterns of Social Behavior in Autism,” (Illinois Wesleyan University, 1997).

[v] R.M. King, professor, Northern Virginia Community College, Virginia


[vii] H. Fraser, The Peanut Allergy Epidemic (NY, Skyhorse, 2011) pp. 124-126.

[viii] B. Richmand, “Hypothesis, Conjugate vaccines may predispose children to autism spectrum disorders,” Medical Hypotheses, Vol. 77, No. 6 (Dec., 2011): 940-7.

[ix] James Altucher, “Save the children (and make money)” The Wall Street Journal (Mon. Aug. 10, 2009)


Heather Fraser is the author of The Peanut Allergy Epidemic: what’s causing it and how to stop it (NY, Skyhorse, 2011).  She is a Toronto-based writer and holistic health practitioner.  Her son, now 18, was diagnosed with peanut allergy in 1995. Find out more at  and



Posted in Featured, Science & Research | Leave a comment